![]() ![]() So if I take a high ISO image and view the RAW and TIFF created in C1 and compare to photoshop. So to summarize the preview in C1 unless zoomed to 100% and even then with high ISO files there are some color mismatches does not match the Tiff files that are created when I edit with photoshop. I have it set to Adobe RGB when I edit with photoshop. The strange thing is that the Tiff file looks in C1 like it does in photoshop, which is less saturated. My problem is also that the preview in C1 of RAW files shows different colors depending on the level of zooming in and the only accurate judgement is at 100%. So it seems you can only edit photos at 100% for color accuracy otherwise you cannot properly judge the colors. So that when you edit the image and then click on edit in photoshop, you get a TIFF that is much less saturated then the preview in C1. I wanted to ask if anyone has also experienced the issue where RAW files when not viewed at 100% have different colors often over saturated. I tried a lot of other software on OS X, Linux, *nix, Windows and Andriod. The more saturated a color is, the more it is de-saturated and shifted in CO. The readout value is correct.įor anything beyond sRGB (color spaces larger than sRGB), remember that CO1 converts ALL Jpeg and tiff images to sRGB before displaying them in the CO1 viewer.īoth images in the screenshot are created in the same color space and with exactly the same color. Just adding a screenshot for my AdobeRGB example.Įdit: The image is tagged as 'adjusted' because I tried changing the profile and reverted manually without resetting. Is it me doing something wrong, or is it CO? Even when viewing the small sRGB image in AdobeRGB and vice versa. The funny thing is, that CO shows the correct color values when the image is too small for CO to be edited. Setting the proof profile to 'no profile' doesn't change the look of the colors. That's visible even without color readouts. The big editable one incorrectly shows sRGB (222,39,34,93). ![]() The small, uneditable one correctly shows sRGB (223,15,32,79). Step 3: start CO, create a clean new session, and view both images side-by-side in proof profile sRGB. Step 2: create the same sRGB image with 3000x3000px. Step 1: create a small tiff image with 300x300px and a saturated, solid red or yellow color like sRGB (223,15,32) in PS, AP or Gimp. I can easily reproduce it here, on 2 different MBP (2009 & 2014). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |